Last week, after the Gap brand sprung a new logo on unsuspecting consumers, and the internet went nuts with passionate pleas for the return of the old logo. Today, the company honored that plea.
NEW YORK (AdAge.com) — Just four days after confirming its surprise new logo was, in fact, legit Gap is returning to its old design, Ad Age has learned. The announcement is expected to be made at 4:30 Pacific Time on Monday on the brand’s Facebook page.
Marka Hansen, Gap North America president, informed the company’s marketing department this afternoon of the change, acknowledging that the switch was a mistake and that the company would be tabling any changes for the foreseeable future.
The logo, created by New York agency Laird & Partners, was intended to be a long-term commitment for the brand with a nod to the future. Ms. Hansen’s about-face about the Gap’s new logo was foreshadowed by a blog post she wrote for the Huffington Post last Thursday. “We chose this design as it’s more contemporary and current. It honors our heritage through the blue box while still taking it forward,” she said. “Now, given the passionate outpouring from customers that followed, we’ve decided to engage in the dialogue, take their feedback on board and work together as we move ahead and evolve to the next phase of Gap.”
The only nagging question in my mind– Did they think really think that logo was the future mark of the brand or was it something drawn up in the marketing dept to create consumer engagement? Now you have millions of people passionately discussing the Gap brand, both for and against the change.
Why not? Isn’t that what the digital age is all about. Give the people an opportunity to voice their opinions before they spend tens-of-millions of dollars in changing the logos on storefronts, clothes, etc. Then if they hate it you can always not change it.
This way all they loose is the money spent on designing it and gain millions of people looking at Gap and rediscovering how they feel about the brand.
I think its a win….What do you think?



